Posts Tagged: Jurisprudence

The Concept of Law: Preface

The Concept of Law is a very important book, in fact, the Editors’ note of this book explains why: ‘The Concept of Law transformed the way jurisprudence was understood and studied in the English-speaking world and beyond.’ Thus, if you understand this

The Concept of Law: Preface

The Concept of Law is a very important book, in fact, the Editors’ note of this book explains why: ‘The Concept of Law transformed the way jurisprudence was understood and studied in the English-speaking world and beyond.’ Thus, if you understand this

Understanding Austin Further- Roger Cotterrell

Important for students: Roger Cotterrell is super important when it comes to defending Austin against the critique of Hart’s and other jurists. I think we should be grateful to him for forming a line of argument that presents a cogent

Understanding Austin Further- Roger Cotterrell

Important for students: Roger Cotterrell is super important when it comes to defending Austin against the critique of Hart’s and other jurists. I think we should be grateful to him for forming a line of argument that presents a cogent

Minimum Content of Natural Law

Alright, this post will help you understand Chapter 9 of the Concept of Law. I’ll try to make Jurisprudence interesting but the success of this subject is contingent upon your readings.  Keep this as a backup summary. Also I’ve added

Minimum Content of Natural Law

Alright, this post will help you understand Chapter 9 of the Concept of Law. I’ll try to make Jurisprudence interesting but the success of this subject is contingent upon your readings.  Keep this as a backup summary. Also I’ve added

Radical vs. Liberal Feminist Legal Theory

Please remember that when you’re answering an exam question that requires you to compare and contrast different schools of feminist legal thought, then don’t start off directly with the types of schools and comparing them, it is recommended and super

Radical vs. Liberal Feminist Legal Theory

Please remember that when you’re answering an exam question that requires you to compare and contrast different schools of feminist legal thought, then don’t start off directly with the types of schools and comparing them, it is recommended and super

Feminist Legal Theory

This is going to be a summarized and condensed version of extracts and some analysis on feminist legal theory based on the guide, some articles, and other readings including Morrison, Lloyd etc. There’s always a lot more reading to do.

Feminist Legal Theory

This is going to be a summarized and condensed version of extracts and some analysis on feminist legal theory based on the guide, some articles, and other readings including Morrison, Lloyd etc. There’s always a lot more reading to do.

Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules

The discussion in this post is one related to Chapter 5 of the Concept of Law. Chapter 5 of The Concept of Law is called: “Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules” Here Hart is asserting that the

Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules

The discussion in this post is one related to Chapter 5 of the Concept of Law. Chapter 5 of The Concept of Law is called: “Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules” Here Hart is asserting that the

Hart vs. Austin

This post is a summary of Chp 2-4 of Hart’s Concept of Law. It will help answer a question that is often repeated in the examination questions on Hart’s critique of Austin. This kind of question is a Section A

Hart vs. Austin

This post is a summary of Chp 2-4 of Hart’s Concept of Law. It will help answer a question that is often repeated in the examination questions on Hart’s critique of Austin. This kind of question is a Section A